Systematic approach to selecting and evaluating critical infrastructure partners while minimizing operational and counterparty risks.
Vendor selection is crucial for stablecoin integration success. This framework ensures a comprehensive evaluation process that balances technical capabilities, financial stability, regulatory compliance, and operational excellence.
Create standardized scoring mechanisms for each vendor category.
Vendor Assessment Criteria
├── Financial Stability
│ ├── Market Cap/Backing
│ ├── Audit History
│ └── Insurance Coverage
├── Technical Capability
│ ├── Infrastructure Robustness
│ ├── API Quality
│ └── Integration Success
├── Regulatory Standing
│ ├── Licenses
│ ├── Jurisdictions
│ └── Compliance History
└── Operational Excellence
├── Track Record
├── SLA Performance
└── Support Quality
Criteria | Weight | Scoring Method |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | 25% | >$5B: 5, >$1B: 3, <$1B: 1 |
Reserve Quality | 20% | Asset mix, audit frequency |
Regulatory Clarity | 20% | Jurisdiction coverage |
Technical Integration | 15% | API capabilities |
Market Adoption | 20% | Trading volume, partners |
Criteria | Weight | Scoring Method |
---|---|---|
Security Infrastructure | 30% | MPC, HSM implementation |
Insurance Coverage | 20% | Coverage amount/types |
Regulatory Compliance | 20% | Licenses, certifications |
Integration Capabilities | 15% | API coverage |
Operational Track Record | 15% | Years active, incidents |
Deep dive into technical capabilities and infrastructure resilience.
graph TD
A[Infrastructure Review] --> B[Security Audit]
A --> C[Performance Testing]
A --> D[Integration Assessment]
B --> E[Vulnerability Scan]
C --> F[Load Testing]
D --> G[API Evaluation]
Technical Requirements
├── Security
│ ├── Encryption Standards
│ ├── Key Management
│ └── Access Controls
├── Performance
│ ├── TPS Capacity
│ ├── Latency Metrics
│ └── Scalability
├── Integration
│ ├── API Documentation
│ ├── SDK Quality
│ └── Support Tools
└── Compliance
├── Audit Logs
├── Reporting Tools
└── Compliance APIs